Yesterday I enlightened readers on the rampant success that home teams in the Pac-12 have enjoyed once the calendar turns to February. That ever-giving well is not dry. There are more profits in this conference just waiting to be exploited.
If you have already tasted the sweet fruit of Pac-12 February games and are back for more – welcome! If you stumbled across this page before reading Part One, click the link above to take you back.
Let’s get started.
Betting February Unders in the Pac-12
I touched on conferences that always seem to play under the total in an earlier article and the Pac-12 was not one of them. When February rolls around, however, that changes. The oddsmakers have adjusted to this trend a bit, but Pac-12 teams continue to score less than anticipated. Check out the average total set by Vegas in Pac-12 conference games per month, since the 2011-12 season.
Month | Avg Total |
December | 148.6 |
January | 143.0 |
February | 142.7 |
March | 141.1 |
The totals decrease throughout the year and yet the unders keep profiting in February. How lucrative is Pac-12 February under betting? Try this stat on for size. Since 2011, the under has won 55.7% of the time. That is over $2,000 in profit for $100/game bettors.
Season | Under % | Avg Total |
2017-18 | 53.5% | 146.3 |
2016-17 | 54.5% | 147.4 |
2015-16 | 56.8% | 149.2 |
2014-15 | 54.8% | 136.3 |
2013-14 | 47.5% | 141.0 |
2012-13 | 59.1% | 135.7 |
2011-12 | 62.8% | 131.8 |
Total | 55.7% | 141.1 |
Betting Against the Pac-12 in the Dance
Okay, this is cheating because the title of my article includes the phrase “in February” and not “in March”. There is a recent trend of Pac-12 NCAA tourney favorites underperforming both SU and ATS, however, and I would be remiss if I did not share it with you.
Since the 2015-16 season (the 2016 tournament), Pac-12 teams have let down their backers when favored in the dance. As is normally the case for major conference teams, Pac-12 clubs have had numerous opportunities in this situation, totalling 18 such games in this 3-year stretch. Check out these numbers for Pac-12 faves in March Madness.
Season | ATS Record (%) | SU Record (%) | Avg Line |
2017-18 | 0-3 (0%) | 0-3 (0%) | -4.3 |
2016-17 | 4-4 (50%) | 7-2 (77.8%) | -8.6 |
2015-16 | 3-3 (50%) | 4-2 (66.7%) | -8.1 |
Total | 7-10 (41.2%) | 11-7 (61.1%) | -7.7 |
I will be the first to admit that those ATS numbers are not eye-popping. Sure, they have only won 41.2% over the past 3 seasons, but that is purely because of a bad tournament this last year. The ATS win rate for these games was in no-man’s land the 2 years prior.
I included the ATS numbers because they are a good supporting bet for a little extra upside. The moneyline is where bettors can fill up. Betting against favored Pac-12 teams in the tourney would have yielded profits in each of the past 3 seasons.
Using our wonderful formula, we can determine that these Pac-12 teams would have needed to win approximately 66%, 82%, and 80% SU respectively to profit. It is easy to see that these teams were not profitable on the moneyline, given that their actual SU win rates were 0%, 77.8%, and 66.7%.
Take this valuable information and put it to good use. See you on the top!
Kreighton loves sports, math, writing, and winning — he combines all of them as a writer for WagerBop. His favorite sports to review are MLB, NFL, NBA, NCAAF, and NCAABB.
Leave a Reply